Married (TV series) - Wikipedia
Kidding is an American comedy-drama television series created by Dave Holstein that premiered on September 9, , on Showtime. The series stars Jim Carrey, Frank Langella, Judy Greer, Cole Allen, Juliet Morris, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . After reading a letter from her, Jeff takes her out on a date. This provocative reality series takes an inside look at polyamory: Lindsey and Anthony are married, but live in a triad with their girlfriend, Vanessa. Husband. Each movie is written as a set of four standard half-hour episodes. Eps, Title, Writers, Director, Release date, Original airdate out that she is already in a polyamorous relationship with several other men. Amy finally marries Kif but their marriage is short lived when Zapp betrays Kif and causes a huge accident which ends.
Eventually, she helps him find his father, who turns out to be Senator Judd Fitzgerald, and she becomes his defender. By season three, he is Michael's loyal right-hand man.
However, he is falling in love with Michael's girlfriend Kath, which Michael suspects. He has tried to keep at arm's length distance from Kath out of loyalty and fear of Michael. However, Michael's suspicions seem to be getting the better of him. Thanks to events in the first season, Moe holds a grudge against Michael that persists through the whole series. List of Brotherhood episodes Season 1: Caffee had been in hiding for seven years after the man vowed to kill him.
Upon returning he begins to re-assume his old criminal business alongside his friend Pete McConagle. Michael's boss Freddie Cork tries to blackmail Michael's politician brother Tommy Caffee into assigning him lucrative contracts with a threat to kill Michael. Tommy refuses to be swayed and tells Freddie that he does not care about Michael. Michael manages to arrange a temporary truce with Freddie. Eileen Caffee is cheating on her husband Tommy with Carl Hobbs and is also concealing drug use from her family.
Tommy defuses the owners intentions to press charges by passing her on to Declan Giggs, an officer who was once friends with the Caffees. Giggs tells her it is too dangerous to testify against the Irish gangs.
They are unsuccessful but the scandal costs Tommy further political capital and he pledges his loyalty to the speaker of the house. Eileen's drug use intensifies and she is arrested for erratic behavior; Pete also gives in to his addiction and Michael takes him to Alcoholics Anonymous.
Tommy's eldest daughter Mary Rose is caught trying some of her mother's drugs by Michael and he gives her a job in his store to keep an eye on her. The accident was caused by the suicide of Freddie Cork's son, who was openly homosexual. Michael uses this information to manipulate Freddie. Freddie pressures Tommy into ensuring that his son receives a Roman Catholic requiem mass.
Carl is also killed and Eileen resolves to atone for her sins. Marty Trio's wife is also killed and he finally decides to work with the police. Rose confronts Michael about how he makes his living. Tommy discovers that his daughter has been working for Michael, ending their period of cooperation.
- Polyamory: Married & Dating
Attorneywho has promised him immunity if he will testify about Michael's dealing with Freddie. He must also protect his brother from being whacked by Moe Riley, who has been released from prison and is out for revenge.
Declan finds his partner may be a dirty cop and must decide where his loyalty lies.
Oh no, there's been an error
He blames Michael for making him "go bad" and pistol whips him. Unlike episode titles from season one which were based Bible passages, season two episode titles were based on lyrics from songs written and performed by Bob Dylan.
The first episode officially aired on September 30,with the season finale airing on December 2. However, on July 18,the first two episodes of season 2 were leaked to the internet via torrent.
Michael has survived Declan's attack, though his awareness is compromised and he has no memory of the attack. Michael finds himself shut out of the mob's activity, with Freddie having sold the liquor store while Michael was sick. Desperate to prove his competence, Michael kills a jewish gangster who owes Freddie money, but not before having the first in a series of paralyzing seizures.
Tommy has grown closer to Judd as he continues to counter Franklin's efforts against both Michael and himself. Judd asks Tommy to reign in Rep. Paul Carvahlo, the Portuguese representative who is publicly backing a rival Portuguese candidate for U. Ellis Franklin has Tommy sit for a deposition about Michael and Freddie, but when he fails to tell Franklin what he wants to hear, Franklin sets up one of his detectives as a businessman looking to bribe Tommy for a state contract.
When Tommy sees through the trap, he sets up Carvahlo with the same detective, stalling Franklin's investigation and neutering Carvahlo's support for the rival candidate. Declan spirals out of control after Cassie leaves him and Moe blackmails him, as Moe is the only one who knows Declan tried to kill Michael at the Finnerty wedding. However, Declan assures Moe that if anyone finds out about the wedding, everyone will find out about Moe's deal with the Secret Service.
It ended on December 21, The titles of all episodes of season three are quotations from Shakespeare. Season 3 begins in the late summer, and it's implied that the events of Season two have had a few months to sink in. That is, it is not known whether these laws could treat some trios or larger groups as common-law marriages. If marriage is intended, most countries provide for both a religious marriage, and a civil ceremony sometimes combined.
These recognize and formalize the relationship. Few Western countries give either religious or legal recognition — or permission — to marriages with three or more partners.
While a recent case in the Netherlands was commonly read as demonstrating that the Netherlands permitted multiple-partner civil unions this belief is mistaken.
The relationship in question was a samenlevingscontractor "cohabitation contract," and not a registered partnership or marriage Dutch-language sourceEnglish-language source. The Netherlands' law concerning registered partnerships provides that: A person may be involved in one only registered partnership with one other person whether of the same or of opposite sex at any one time.
Persons who enter into a registered partnership may not at the same time be married. Married people with partners external to their marriage need to consider carefully the laws in their jurisdiction, to ensure that they are complied with, and consider how to ensure that the mutuality of their decision within their marriage is clear. Legal theory Edit There is an ongoing discussion among polyamory activists regarding a legal model of polyamorous marriage i.
One debate centers around the relative merits of an all-with-all approach to marriage whereby three or more persons are all joined together at the same time within a single marriage and dyadic networks whereby existing laws against bigamy are revised such that people are perfectly free to be concurrently married to multiple other persons, provided that each such new marriage is preceded by a legal notification regarding the pending new marriage to all those to whom one is already married; failure to provide that legal notification would then constitute the updated crime of bigamy.
Dyadic networks would result in what might be thought of as a "molecular" family structure — one which might be best represented by the molecular diagrams commonly used in chemistry. In this way, marriage would remain a dyadic relationship i. Dyadic networks can correctly represent any situation associated with the "all-with-all" paradigm, as well as many situations that the "all-with-all" paradigm cannot deal with. A "complete" dyadic network would take the form of a complete graphin which every person is pairwise married to every other person, thus correctly representing any situation associated with the "all-with-all" paradigm.
A dyadic network may also represent situations in which some persons are pairwise married to some members of the dyadic network but not to all of them "V" and "N" geometries, for example — these are situations that the "all-with-all" marriage paradigm is unable to accurately represent. The "all-with-all" marriage paradigm assumes that everyone is equally involved with everyone else in the group — one global marriage agreement has to fit every participant at the same time.
But dyadic network marriages separately define the terms of each specific 2-person relationship, and these dyadic marriages do not typically happen at the same time A marries B, B marries C "V" structureC marries D "N" structureetc.
Participants in a dyadic network need not even be aware of the specific terms of marriage agreements existing elsewhere within the same dyadic network. Under the "all-with-all" marriage paradigm, when irreconcilable differences arise there can be no alternative to a complete separation — one person cannot divorce another without ending the entire marriage agreement for everyone involved.
But dyadic networks can function in much the same way as watertight compartmentalization functions in naval vessels, i. An intense disagreement between two persons takes place within the context of their marriage, and need not greatly involve or threaten the relationships between other participants.
Within a well-connected dyadic network, a divorce between two persons need not result in a complete separation of the network — for example, a dyadic network with triangle geometry would simply turn into a dyadic network with "V" geometry.
An "all-with-all" marriage can only exist or cease to exist. In contrast, the shape of a dyadic network can dynamically change over time.
Divorces subtract connections, and marriages add connections. The dyadic network itself either changes shape, separates into two dyadic networks, or merges into another dyadic network, depending on the precise nature of the newly added or subtracted connection. The maximum size of an "all-with-all" marriage is limited by the fact that every participant must be aware of the existence of every other participant otherwise the global marriage contract would be invalid, because it could not satisfy the legal condition known as a "meeting of the minds".
But since a dyadic network relies only upon every participant's local knowledge of his or her own direct partners, its size is theoretically unlimited.
The dyadic network paradigm is so powerful that it is theoretically capable of managing a situation in which every adult on earth is legally joined together in a single enormous dyadic network. Thus, with the dyadic network model, the idea of "many loves" is directly translated into a practical reality, and the "infinity" symbol representing love without limits is directly matched by a marriage model capable of handling an infinitely large number of participants.
However, the "all-with-all" or "dyadic" are not the only possible forms of polyamorous marriage. As another example, entry and exit of a marriage contract may follow the model of shareholders in a corporation or members in a limited liability corporation.
Polyamory as a lifestyle Separate from polyamory as a philosophical basis for relationship, are the practical ways in which people who live a polyamorous lifestyle arrange their lives, the issues they face, and how these compare to those living a monogamous lifestyle.
Values within polyamory Main article: Values within polyamory Relationships classed as polyamorous involve an emotional bond and often a longer term intent, though these distinctions are a topic open to debate and interpretation.
Many people in the swinging and polyamory communities see both practices as part of a broader spectrum of open intimacy and sexuality. Also note that the values discussed here are ideals. As with any ideals, their adherents sometimes fall short of the mark — but major breaches of a polyamorous relationship's ideals are taken as seriously as such breaches would be in any other relationship. Common values cited within such relationships include: Fact Fidelity and loyalty: Many polyamorists define fidelity as being faithful to the promises and agreements they have made, rather than in terms of per se sexual exclusivity.
Having a secret sexual relationship which violated one's negotiated agreements would be seen as lacking fidelity. Polyamorists generally base definitions of commitment on considerations other than sexual exclusivity, e. Most polyamorists emphasize respect, trust and honesty for all partners.
This requires that each partner will support, and not undermine, the other, and will not deliberately use a secondary relationship to harm another party or relationship. Because there is no "standard model" for polyamorous relationships, and reliance upon common expectations may not be realistic, polyamorists often advocate explicitly deciding the ground rules of their relationships with all concerned, and often emphasize that this should be an ongoing process of communication and respect.
Polyamorists usually take a pragmatic approach to their relationships; they accept that sometimes they and their partners will make mistakes and fail to live up to these ideals, and that communication is important for repairing any breaches.
Polyamorists believe that restrictions on other deep relationships are not for the best, as they tend to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control.
They tend to see their partner's partners in terms of the gain to their partner's life rather than the threat to their own see compersion.
Poly relationships do vary and some can be possessive or provide for the primary partner's veto or approval, whilst others are asymmetrical —possessive one way, but not the other.
Sharing of domestic burden Edit Claimed benefits of a polyamorous lifestyle include the following: Emotional and similar support structure provided by other committed adults within the family unit.
A wider range of experience, skills, resources, and perspectives that multiple adults bring to a relationship. The ability to share chores and child supervision, reducing domestic and child rearing pressure upon adults' time without needing to pay for outside child carers.
Greatly reduced per capita cost of living. Increased financial stability—the loss of one income is not the entirety of the family income if only one parent worksor half the family income if both parents workbut may be far less. Specific issues affecting polyamorous relationships Edit Polyamorists cite the human tendency towards jealousy and possessiveness as major hurdles in polyamory, and also as personal limitations to overcome: When people are viewed, even inadvertently, as possessions, they become a commodity, a valuable one at that.
Just as most people are reluctant to let go of what little money that they have, people are also reluctant to "share" their beloved.
These sorts of inferiority complexes must be resolved, completely, before a polyamorous relationship can be truly successful"  An editorial article on the polyamory website Polyamoryonline. Polyamory social settings involving children. The author, herself in a polyamorous relationship of three adults, comments that: After this was established, we sort of fell into our patterns of school, practices, just normal life in general.
The kids all started realizing that there were three of us to care for them when they were sick, three of us to get scolded from, hugs from, tickles from; three of us to feed the small army of mouths and three of us to trust completely in.
After trust was established, they asked more questions. Why do we have to live together? Why do you guys love each other? Why do I have to listen to them non-biological parent? We answered them as truthfully as we could and as much as was appropriate for their age. I found that it was more unnerving for me to think about how to approach a new kid and their parents than it ever was for the kids. Like other elements of polyamory, the way in which children are integrated into the family structure varies widely.
Parents are primarily responsible for their own children biological, adoptive, or step-but other members of the relationship act as an extended familyproviding assistance in child-rearing.
Adults raise children collectively, all taking equal responsibility for each child regardless of consanguinity.
Brotherhood (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia
Parents are wholly responsible for their own children, with other members of the relationship relating to the children as friends of the parents. Children treat parents' partners as a form of step-parent. The choice of structures is affected by timing: